"Species in which there are fewer living organisms than malaria (again, other things being equal) will take proportionately longer to develop a cluster of mutations of the complexity of malaria’s resistance to chloroquine." Michael Behe, The Edge of Evolution, 20071
"The enormous long-term effective population sizes of prokaryotes may impose a substantial barrier to the evolution of complex genomes and morphologies." Michael Lynch and John Conery, Science, 20032
Summary
Some organisms have been watched closely enough that their evolution can be put on a ledger. One side of the ledger counts how many were born and how many mutations they carried. The other side counts what those mutations produced. This article states the method, fills in one table for every organism the series has worked through, and asks how far the result can be carried over to mammals.
Evolution sometimes creates new function, and this site says so. The scoring rules are in Measuring Biological Information. The question here is the price.
- The method is three multiplications. Births are population size times generations. Mutations explored are births times the mutation rate per genome. Tries at one named single-letter change are births times the rate for that change. Each input is uncertain by a factor of two to ten, so every total is good to an order of magnitude and no better.
- Every microbe on the table tried every possible single-letter change many times. HIV made each one at least 1015 times, the malaria parasite about 1011 times, and each of Lenski's flasks about 180 times.3 One-step changes were never in short supply.
- What the searches bought is small and mostly adjustment. The malaria parasite, in 75 years and more than 1021 births, produced one gain, one loss and six modifications, 18 to 100 nucleotides in all.4 Lenski's twelve populations produced one new ability in one flask in 82,000 generations.5 6 No row of the table contains a new gene with a shown benefit. Influenza, SARS-CoV-2 and tuberculosis were added in version 2 and did not change that: between them they produced one gain, the glycosylation sites of influenza's haemagglutinin, against five losses, twenty-six modifications and three transfers.
- The price depends on the kind of change far more than on the organism. A change of one letter costs about 1010 to 1012 parasites.7 Four changes that each pay took phage lambda twelve days in a flask.8 A change that needs more than one step before it pays cost about 1020 parasites.7
- Selection is more effective in small fast organisms, by about a thousandfold and not by 1020. Michael Lynch's data put the typical effective population size of bacteria near 108 and of vertebrates near 105.9 The malaria parasite's effective size is 2 to 3 × 105, no larger than a fly's.10
- The figure of fewer than 1020 mammals is a guess. It traces to an anonymous forum answer.11 Behe's own figure is 1018.1 A count built from a 2023 census of wild mammals gives about 6 × 1019, uncertain tenfold either way.12
- The head-count extrapolation fails. A newborn mammal carries 29 to 63 new mutations and a newborn parasite carries 0.0057. All mammals together made more mutations than the parasite did, tried each single-letter change about as often, and made each named pair of changes more often.13 Behe's sentence about mammals carries the parasite's price over in organisms and leaves out the mutation rate.
- The per-lineage form of the argument survives. The genome of one living mammal was built along one line of descent, and one line has 1014 to 1017 births. That is enough for every single-letter change and too few to count on any named pair.14 Mainstream theory agrees: Rick Durrett and Deena Schmidt found that one named pair of changes in the human line "would take >100 million years."15
- What nobody has measured is how much of a mammal genome needed unpaid steps. The argument turns on that number. The ledger cannot supply it, and the ledger is a lower bound on output, which cuts against the young-earth side.
Part 1: The method
The input side
An organism's search has three inputs.
Population size. Two different numbers go by this name. The census size is a head count. The effective size is the size of an ideal population that would drift at the same rate, and it is estimated from how much the DNA of living individuals differs. This article says which one each figure is. The census sets how many new mutations arise. The effective size sets how well selection can tell a slightly better variant from a slightly worse one.
Census figures come from counting a sample and multiplying. Nicholas White put the world's malaria parasites at "about 1017" by multiplying parasites per patient by patients.7 His own range for sick people alone runs from 5 × 1016 to 5 × 1017, a factor of ten. Estimates of HIV per patient run from 1010 to 1012.16 A laboratory flask is known much better, to about a factor of two.
Generations. Time watched divided by generation time. The malaria parasite's blood cycle is 48 hours. HIV's cycle is about two and a half days. Lenski's bacteria double 6.64 times a day.17
Mutation rate. The number of new mutations per letter of DNA per generation, measured by sequencing parents and offspring or by growing lines under almost no selection and sequencing them. For the malaria parasite the pooled figure is 2.45 × 10−10 per base pair per cycle, from 85 mutations in 279 clones.18 An earlier study of fewer clones gave values up to forty times higher, and the parasite article explains why the later figure is used. For humans the figure is 1.20 × 10−8 per letter per generation, or 63 new mutations per child.19 For Lenski's bacteria it is 8.9 × 10−11.20
Three products follow.
| Quantity | How it is computed |
|---|---|
| Births | census size × generations |
| Mutations explored | births × mutation rate per letter × letters in the genome |
| Tries at one named single-letter change | births × mutation rate per letter ÷ 3, doubled where each individual carries two copies |
| Tries at one named pair arising together | births × the square of the rate for one named change |
The division by three is there because a letter can change to any of three others. It treats the three as equally likely, which is wrong by up to a factor of two.
The unit is births and not years. A line in the notes behind this series puts it well: winning a lottery does not depend on how long one has been playing, it depends on how many tickets one buys. A bacterium that divides every hour buys tickets faster than an elephant, and the ledger counts tickets.
The output side
Every documented adaptive change in the organism goes on the ledger, including the ones that weaken the argument. Each is scored by the four classes of Measuring Biological Information: gain, loss, modification or transfer of function. Each is marked as watched or inferred.
Then each change is converted to nucleotides where that can be done. The series counts unique functional sequence: nucleotides whose identity matters to some function and which had to be originated and could not be copied. A duplicated gene adds nothing until the copy changes. The purpose is to measure how much work mutation and selection had to do. The conversion rule gives a gain or an upward modification the number of substitutions it required, a downward modification zero, a loss a negative number and a transfer zero in the receiver.
What the ledger cannot see
Two real gains on the table score zero nucleotides, because they were made by rearranging sequence that already existed. A new gene made from DNA that was not a gene cannot be converted at all without measuring which of its letters matter. Adaptations that nobody was looking for are missing. Every total on the output side is therefore a lower bound.
Protein-rarity figures cannot fill the gap. The figures of 1 in 1011 and 1 in 1077 were measured on folded proteins with stated functions. Reported new genes are short and loosely structured, and those figures do not apply to them. How Rare Is a Working Protein? gives the reasons.
Part 2: The table
This is version 2, of 27 September 2026. Each row is taken from the article on that organism, which carries the detail and the sources. The rows for influenza, SARS-CoV-2 and Mycobacterium tuberculosis were filled when those three articles landed. An empty cell means the number is not known.
The search
| System | Alive at once | Effective size | Time | Generations | Births | New mutations per birth | Mutations in total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIV21 | 4 × 1018 virus particles | 450 to 105 in one patient | about 100 years | about 14,000 | 6 × 1022 particles; at most 6 × 1020 infected cells | 0.18 | 1022 by particles; 1020 by infected cells |
| Plasmodium falciparum4 | about 1017 | 2 to 3 × 105 | 75 years22 | 13,700 | 1.5 to 7.5 × 1021 | 0.0057 | 9 × 1018 to 4 × 1019 |
| Long-term evolution experiment23 | 5 × 106 to 5 × 108 in each of 12 flasks | about 107 | 1988 to 2025 | 82,000 | 7.3 × 1013 | 0.00041 | 3.0 × 1010 |
| Phage lambda, 96 flasks24 | 107 to 6 × 109 per flask8 25 | 20 days | 1.9 × 1010 to 1.2 × 1013 | 0.003826 | 7 × 107 to 5 × 1010 | ||
| Sticklebacks, two lakes27 | about 3,000 founders each28 | 8 and 6 years | 8 and 6 | 42,000 at least | 4.729 | 2 × 105 | |
| Humans under malaria30 | 106 to 108, assumed | 1 to 2 × 104 | 7,500 to 10,000 years | 300 to 400 | 3 × 108 to 4 × 1010 | 63 | 2 × 1010 to 3 × 1012 |
| Influenza31 | no standing census; about 1 billion cases a year | 1 to 2 genomes start each new infection | 108 years | 3 × 1021 to 3 × 1023 genomes | 2 to 3 | 7 × 1021 to 1 × 1024 | |
| SARS-CoV-232 | 109 to 1011 virions in one person at the peak | 1 to 8 virions start each new infection | 2019 to late 2021 | 3.8 × 1021 to 1.1 × 1023 virions | 0.0389 | 1.5 × 1020 to 4.4 × 1021 | |
| Mycobacterium tuberculosis33 | about 1015, from 108 in one adult with cavitary disease | about 80 years of the drug era | 3 × 1018 to 3 × 1020 | 0.0009 to 0.009 | 3 × 1015 to 3 × 1017 |
"Alive at once" and "births" are census figures. Effective sizes are estimated from genetic diversity and are far smaller. The parasite's effective size is eleven to twelve orders of magnitude below its census.
The HIV row has two sets of figures. The published HIV article multiplies the mutation rate by virus particles. Its own source for the particle count says that is the wrong population: "the population size is determined by the number of cells infected at each round of replication, not by the number of virions produced by them."34 The mutation rate is measured per round of infection.35 Counting infected cells lowers the births and the mutations a hundredfold. Behe's own estimate, made a different way, was "about 1020 copies of the virus"1. Both figures are printed.
What it bought
| System | Adaptive changes by class | Watched or inferred | Nucleotides of unique functional sequence | Per birth | Could not be priced |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HIV21 | Not scored by class. Vpu came to block human tetherin in two groups. Many immune-escape changes, a number of which revert | Inferred from comparing viruses | No more than 5,000, an upper bound | No more than 8 × 10−20 per particle | Drug resistance; changes made and lost inside one patient |
| P. falciparum4 | 1 gain, 1 loss, 6 modifications | First steps watched; origins of most inferred | 18 to under 100 | 2 × 10−21 to 7 × 10−20 | Extra copies of gch1; a sweep on chromosome 13; unexplained sweeps |
| Long-term evolution experiment23 | 1 gain in 1 flask of 12. Losses lead by count. Many modifications, direction mostly unmeasured | Watched | The gain scores zero. Tuning changes in 57 genes. Nine stretches newly transcribed, none with a shown benefit | ||
| Phage lambda24 | 1 gain, 25 separate origins in 102 flasks | Watched | 48 | 5 × 10−11 to 3 × 10−8 | Better binding to the old receptor |
| Sticklebacks27 | Nothing new arose while watched. Older changes: 1 loss, 3 modifications | Spread watched; origins inferred | All of it. The alleles are older than the lakes | ||
| Humans under malaria30 | 3 gains, 2 of them with a loss. 4 losses. 1 modification | Inferred | 3 | Births are assumed, so no rate is printed | |
| Influenza31 | 1 gain, 1 loss, 7 modifications, 3 transfers | Most watched; the transfers and the 1918 host jump inferred | about 30 distinct positions; 100 to 300 counting every adaptive substitution that fixed | 10−22 to 10−19 per particle | Adaptation counted in three more genes and not explained. The transfers. The 1918 host jump |
| SARS-CoV-232 | No gain. 2 losses, 11 modifications | Watched | 12 to under 100 | 1 × 10−22 to 3 × 10−20 per virion | Omicron's thirty-odd spike changes, not measured one at a time. The changes that hitch-hiked with D614G |
| M. tuberculosis33 | No gain. 2 losses, 8 modifications | Watched in patients; origins inferred | 1 to about 30 | 10−19 to 3 × 10−18 per bacillus | embB, whose direction was never measured |
| Humans and milk36 | 4 modifications upward, 1 of them unsettled. 1 candidate gain | Inferred | 5 | No census | |
| TEM beta-lactamase36 | 1 modification, shifted, 46,000-fold | Rebuilt in the laboratory; seen in hospitals | 537 | No census | |
| NylB36 | 1 modification | Inferred | 238 | Two inputs of the census have no source |
What the table shows
One-step changes were saturated. Divide the mutations in a row by three times the genome length and the result is the number of times each possible single-letter change arose. For HIV it is 4 × 1015 to 4 × 1017. For the malaria parasite it is 1 to 6 × 1011. For influenza it is 2 × 1017 to 2 × 1019, for SARS-CoV-2 2 × 1015 to 5 × 1016, and for tuberculosis 2 × 108 to 2 × 1010. For all twelve of Lenski's flasks it is about 2,200. For the 96 lambda flasks it is 490 to 310,000.3 Zachary Blount and colleagues drew the conclusion for their own experiment: "each population tried every typical one-step mutation many times."39
The gains are few and the adjustments are many. Across the table there are seven scored gains, and two of them are scored as gain with loss. Two of the three organisms added in version 2, SARS-CoV-2 and tuberculosis, produced no gain at all; influenza produced one, the glycosylation sites of its haemagglutinin, and that one is conceded without hedging. Michael Behe's rule of thumb predicts this. He estimated that a helpful mutation that works by lowering a protein's activity should appear "100–1000 times" as often as one "that requires specific changes to a gene."40 All twelve of Lenski's populations lost the use of ribose within 2,000 generations.41 In his experiment presumed knockouts "contribute most (>50%) of the early adaptive mutations" and about a quarter later on.42 The rule describes what arrives first. It has not been shown to be a limit. Every gain in the series, watched or reconstructed, is gathered with its score and grade in When Evolution Creates Information.
Output per birth runs from 10−22 to 10−8. Influenza, SARS-CoV-2, the parasite and HIV sit at the low end, within about three orders of magnitude of each other. Tuberculosis sits an order of magnitude above HIV, and the reason is not that it built more but that it had a thousandfold fewer births to build it in. The lambda flasks sit fourteen orders of magnitude above the bottom. The organisms do not differ that much in their biology. The difference is the ratio of tickets to prizes. The world's parasites were offered a handful of new problems, a few drugs and a diagnostic test, and they made 1021 births against them. Most of those births repeated mutations that had already been tried billions of times. Each lambda flask was given one hard problem, every phage in it faced that problem, and the supply of mutations was just enough.
This matters for everything that follows. There is no fixed rate of output per organism that can be carried from one row to another. What can be carried over is a price list.
| Kind of change | Example | Price |
|---|---|---|
| One named letter | Atovaquone or pyrimethamine resistance | About 1012 parasites per origin.7 The mutation itself arises once in 1.2 × 1010 parasites3 |
| Four letters, each step paying | Lambda's new receptor | 108 to 1011 phage per flask, 25 flasks of 10224 |
| Five letters, most orders blocked | Beta-lactamase | 102 of 120 orders of the five steps cannot be taken by selection.37 No census |
| More than one step before any benefit | Chloroquine resistance | About 1020 parasites per origin7 |
| A rearrangement that joins a promoter to a silent gene | Citrate use | 1 flask of 12 in 82,000 generations; weeks under a different regime23 |
| A new gene with a shown benefit | None on the table |
The chloroquine price is the one the argument leans on, and it has held up. The first mutation on the path harms the parasite, and forms carrying one, two or three of the changes have not been found established in the field.43 The price matches the supply of one named pair of mutations arising in the same parasite, which is one per 1.5 × 1020.3
Part 3: Why selection is stronger in small fast organisms
The argument
A mutation that helps by one part in a thousand is seen by selection only if chance does not swamp it. Chance is weaker in large populations. The rule of thumb is that selection sees a mutation when its effect is larger than about one over the effective population size.
Tomoko Ohta built the nearly neutral theory on this. She wrote that codon choice in Escherichia coli is shaped by selection "because of the efficient selection in very large populations" while in mammals it is set mostly by mutation.44
Michael Lynch and John Conery measured it across the tree of life in 2003. Diversity at silent sites implied effective sizes "generally greater than 108 for prokaryotes" and 104 to 105 for vertebrates.2 Lynch's 2006 review concluded that "the efficiency of natural selection declines dramatically between prokaryotes, unicellular eukaryotes, and multicellular eukaryotes."45 He gave three reasons, and all three get worse as organisms get larger: "small population size, tight linkage, and high background mutational activity"45.
His 2023 dataset holds 144 species with both a measured mutation rate and a measured diversity. The median effective size is 8.9 × 107 for bacteria and 9.3 × 104 for vertebrates. Humans stand at about 22,000.46 9
Large populations also reach multi-step changes sooner. Lynch and Adam Abegg found that "even in the face of deleterious intermediate steps, the time to establishment is minimized in populations with very large size."47
What the HIV article's three sources say
The published HIV article says selection is much stronger in an RNA virus than in a mammal and cites three sources. Each was read for this article.
Rambaut and colleagues, 2004. The sentence is there: "HIV shows stronger positive selection than any other organism studied so far."16 It rests on a study of 50 patients in which the envelope gene fixed one adaptive change about every two and a half months under immune attack. The authors do not say the cause is a small genome. On the same page they say that selection rules inside a patient and does not rule between patients: "intra-host and inter-host evolution seem to be very different processes, with positive selection dominating in the former but not the latter."16
Lynch, 2006. The two sentences quoted in the HIV article are verbatim. Its summary of Lynch's third reason is backwards. It says larger organisms have lower mutation rates per nucleotide. Lynch says they have higher ones, from 5.0 × 10−10 in prokaryotes to 5.4 × 10−8 in vertebrates per generation.45
Sanford and colleagues, 2007. The sentence is a modelling choice in the description of a computer program: "This is consistent with the expectation that each nucleotide in a smaller genome on average plays a greater relative role in the organism’s fitness."48 It is an expectation and was not measured.
The counter-arguments
The benchmarked microbes do not have large effective sizes. The malaria parasite's is 210,000 to 300,000.10 Lynch and Conery name it as an exception whose effective size is set "by that of their larger host"2. HIV's is 450 to 100,000 inside one patient.21 Lenski's flasks are near 107.49 By the measure that governs how well selection works, the parasite and HIV are no better placed than an insect. Lynch puts the general point in one line: effective sizes across life differ by "nearly 20 orders of magnitude less than the disparity in absolute numbers"45.
Bottlenecks and sweeps cause this. Each infection starts from a few parasites or virus particles. Each daily transfer in a flask keeps one cell in a hundred. Lynch and Conery state the rule: "a large population can behave genetically like a small one if a minor fraction of individuals contribute to the reproductive pool or if beneficial chromosomal segments periodically sweep through the population."2
Clones interfere. Without sex, two helpful mutations in different cells cannot be combined. One lineage wins and the other is lost. Michael Desai and colleagues found that the speed of adaptation in asexual yeast rises with "the logarithm of the population size"50. A population a thousand times larger adapts faster by a small multiple. Lenski's flasks show the same thing.49
Recombination. Mammals have it in every generation. Lenski's bacteria and the lambda flasks do not. HIV and the malaria parasite do: HIV's rate is "one of the highest of all organisms"16 and the parasite mates in the mosquito. Recombination therefore separates mammals from half of the table and not from the other half.
Two copies of each gene. A harmful first step can hide behind a working copy in a mammal. A blood-stage parasite has one copy. This should make some two-step changes easier in mammals. Nobody has measured by how much for a case like chloroquine.
More mutations per birth. A newborn human carries 63 new mutations, and a newborn parasite 0.0057.19 4 Part 4 works out what this does to the comparison.
Standing variation. Large animals adapt mostly from variants already present. The stickleback lakes are the clearest case.28 That speeds adaptation. It does not add to the search, because standing variation is mutation that happened earlier and is already counted. The Daphne Major finches are the same case in a bird: about 170,000 new mutations in forty years, and every measured change a shift in variants older than the species or brought in by interbreeding (Darwin's Finches).
Plasticity. Not every fast change is known to be inherited. Italian wall lizards moved to Pod Mrčaru in 1971 grew gut valves on a plant diet, and the valves were absent in lizards kept on insects, so that case is not yet scoreable and adds nothing to the ledger (Italian Wall Lizards).
Short-term size. Talia Karasov and colleagues showed that flies found insecticide resistance several times over within single populations. They concluded that the effective size "relevant for strong adaptation" may be "much closer to census population sizes."51 For the supply of mutations, head count is the right number. That supports counting births, as the ledger does.
Large populations are not seen to adapt faster. Nicolas Galtier compared 44 pairs of animal species. Large populations removed more harmful changes. His results "do not corroborate the hypothesis that adaptive substitutions accumulate at a faster rate in large populations."52 This result is inferred from comparing genomes and was not watched.
The mainstream theory expects microbes not to build complex genomes. Lynch and Conery's thesis is that introns, mobile elements and spare gene copies spread in eukaryotes because selection was too weak to remove them. The same strong selection that the series credits to microbes is, on this account, "a substantial barrier to the evolution of complex genomes"2. If that is right, a microbe that builds no new genes says little about what a small population does. The account is itself an inference from living genomes. No one has watched spare DNA become a working gene in a small population.
What stands
Selection does work better in large populations. The measured gap between bacteria and vertebrates is about three orders of magnitude, and the organisms on the table sit near the bottom of it. The advantage the microbes do have is supply: enormous numbers of births. Part 4 asks whether mammals were short of supply.
Part 4: The extrapolation, and how far it goes
The argument the series set out to make runs as follows. Fewer than 1020 mammals have lived on the standard timeline. Microbes with more individuals than that produced little. The sequence-specific part of a mammal genome, which Functional DNA puts at 16% to 45% of about three billion letters, therefore has no plausible source. The argument is not new. Joseph Kuhn made it in a medical journal in 2012, calling thirty years of bacteria "analogous to observing mutations in man or any mammal over 200 million years."53 Each step is checked below.
How many mammals
No published estimate was found. Five rough ones exist.
| Source | Inputs | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Behe, 20071 | 5,000 species × 106 each × one generation a year × 2 × 108 years | 1018 |
| Forum answer, 2014, cited by the HIV article11 | All land covered in mice gives 2.88 × 1025; reduced by "4-10 orders of magnitude" | "something like 1020" |
| The notes behind this series | 5,000 species × 5 × 108 each × 4 × 107 generations | 1020 |
| The parasite article12 | 3 × 1011 alive today, from the bats' share of wild mammal weight; one generation a year | 6 × 1019 |
| This article, second route12 | 2 × 1011 alive today, from the weight of animals under one kilogram | 4 × 1019 |
The last two rest on the 2023 census by Lior Greenspoon and colleagues, which found that bats are two-thirds of all individual wild land mammals54 and that animals under one kilogram are ">95% of all individuals" and a fifth of the weight.54 Both assume that mammals were always as abundant as now. Wild land mammals weighed about seven times more before the large species were lost, but large animals are few, so the count changes little.55
The honest figure is about 1020, give or take a factor of ten. "Fewer than 1020" cannot be claimed.
Five ways to compare
| Measure | All mammals, 200 million years | One mammal lineage | Malaria parasite, 75 years | HIV, 100 years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Births | 6 × 1019 | 1014 to 1017 | 1.5 to 7.5 × 1021 | 6 × 1020 to 6 × 1022 |
| New mutations | 2 to 4 × 1021 | 3 × 1015 to 6 × 1018 | 9 × 1018 to 4 × 1019 | 1020 to 1022 |
| Times each single-letter change arose | 2 to 5 × 1011 | 4 × 105 to 8 × 108 | 1 to 6 × 1011 | 4 × 1015 to 4 × 1017 |
| Times each named pair arose together | 800 to 3,800 | 0.001 to 6 | 10 to 50 | 3 × 1010 to 3 × 1012 |
| Letters in the genome | about 3 × 109 | about 3 × 109 | 2.3 × 10718 | 9,181 |
The arithmetic is in the notes.13 14 The mammal columns use the mouse rate of 5.35 × 10−9 per letter per generation at the low end and the human rate at the high end.
Per individual. The parasite had 25 to 125 times as many births as all mammals. This is the comparison the series has used. It treats a mouse and a parasite as one ticket each.
Per genome. A mammal birth is thousands of tickets. All mammals together made about a hundred times more mutations than the parasite did in its drug era, and about as many as HIV.
Per site. The mammal genome is 130 times longer than the parasite's, so those mutations are spread more thinly. The two effects nearly cancel. All mammals tried each single-letter change about as often as the parasite did. The author of the parasite article found this first. For pairs the mammals come out ahead, because the rate per letter enters twice.
Per lineage. All mammals are not one population. A mutation in a bat cannot join one in a whale. The genome of any living mammal was built along one line of descent, which at any moment was one species. With a census of 106 to 109 and 108 generations that line has 1014 to 1017 births. Every single-letter change arose in it hundreds of thousands of times at least. A named pair arising together is expected between once in a thousand lineages and six times in one.
Per adaptive problem. The price of chloroquine resistance, 1020 parasites, matches one named pair of mutations arising in one parasite. At a mammal's mutation rate the same event costs 1.6 to 7.7 × 1016 births, not 1020.14 That is the whole history of an abundant lineage, and a thousand times more than a rare one ever had.
Where Behe's sentence goes wrong
Behe wrote that with 5,000 species of a million animals each for 200 million years, "the likelihood of a single CCC appearing in the whole bunch over that entire time would be only about one in a hundred."1 A CCC is a change as hard as chloroquine resistance. He divided 1018 mammals by 1020 parasites. He stated the condition himself: fewer organisms take longer "other things being equal"1. Other things are not equal. The mutation rate per letter per generation is about fifty times higher in a mammal, and each mammal has two copies. For a pair of changes those factors enter squared. On his own count of 1018 mammals the expected number of times a named pair arose together is 13 to 64, not one hundredth.14
For the human line alone his conclusion holds. He counted a trillion ancestors in ten million years.1 That gives 0.00006 of a named pair. Durrett and Schmidt, who wrote to refute him, computed 216 million years for one named pair in the human line and 162 million by simulation.15 They add that many different pairs might serve, which shortens the wait by an unknown factor. The exchange is reviewed in Haldane's Dilemma.
The size of the target
Functional DNA estimates that at least 16% to 45% of human DNA is sequence-specific. That is 5 × 108 to 1.4 × 109 letters. The estimate counts duplicated sequence, which the unit of this series excludes, and it does not say how much arose within mammals. No ratio is printed here for that reason.
For scale only, and as a figure no model claims: if one lineage had to originate 108 letters in 1014 to 1017 births, the rate would be 10−9 to 10−6 per birth. The parasite and HIV produced 10−21 to 10−19. The lambda flasks produced 10−11 to 10−8. The needed rate is far above anything seen in a natural population and touches the best flask result at one end. A lineage could reach it only if it were handed a steady supply of problems, each solvable by steps that pay one at a time.
What the comparison shows and does not show
It shows that one-step changes are within reach of any mammal lineage. The human record agrees: sickle haemoglobin and the lactase variants are single letters, found in populations of millions within a few thousand years.56 57
It shows that a change needing two named letters before any benefit is out of reach for most lineages and rare in all of them.
It does not show that mammals were short of mutations. They were not.
It does not show how many of the differences between mammals needed unpaid steps. If nearly all adaptive paths pay at every step, as lambda's did, the benchmark sets no limit. If many are like chloroquine resistance, the limit is severe. Daniel Weinreich's beta-lactamase is the one enzyme where every order of the steps was tested: 102 of 120 orders were closed and 18 were open.37 No such census exists for any mammal gene.
Objections and responses
The first eight are the objections drafted in the notes behind this series, each put as a population geneticist would put it. The rest were raised by the organism articles.
1. What matters is elapsed time. Mammals had 200 million years and HIV had a hundred. This fails. A mutation happens when a genome is copied, so the count of copies is the count of chances. Time matters only through the number of generations, and generations are already in the ledger.
2. Retroviruses are too unlike animals to compare. This succeeds in part. HIV's mutation rate per letter is a few thousand times a mammal's and its genome is 9,181 letters, so it made every named pair and every named triple of its own changes many times over.13 That makes it a best case for finding what a tiny genome can find. It says little about a genome a third of a million times longer.
3. Recombination lets animals combine helpful mutations that arise in different individuals. This succeeds against Lenski's flasks and fails against HIV and the malaria parasite, which both recombine. The chloroquine-resistant form swept through parasite populations in "approximately 20-80 sexual generations"58. Recombination speeds the spread of a change that pays. It does not help a first step that harms its carrier.
4. A small genome has few places left to improve, so HIV's short list of gains is a ceiling effect. This succeeds in part. A virus of ten genes that is already good at infecting humans may have little left to find. The same cannot be said of the malaria parasite with 5,300 genes, or of Escherichia coli with citrate in its flask for 31,000 generations before one population used it.
5. The same number of mutations finds more in a larger genome, because there are more places for something useful to arise. This succeeds in part. For one named target a larger genome is no help: the same number of mutations is spread over more letters. For any useful change anywhere, the number of targets may grow with the genome. Whether it does is not known for any organism.
6. The microbes made other gains that nobody detected. This succeeds. Drug resistance is found because patients stop recovering. A change in how a parasite meets a mosquito would leave no such signal. Surveys of the parasite's genome find "multiple regions with signatures of selective sweeps" and most are unexplained.59 The ledger is a lower bound, and how far below the truth it sits is unknown.
7. Mammals had far more generations in each line, so more mutations could be fixed one after another. This succeeds in part. A mammal lineage has about 108 generations and HIV has had 14,000. Changes that must be fixed in sequence have more room in the mammal. In small populations most of what is fixed is fixed by chance and not by selection. The cost of fixing many changes by selection is the subject of Haldane's Dilemma.
8. It is not valid to compare microbes with mammals at all. Biologists do it when the result favours them. Jerry Coyne said of Lenski's citrate result that "you can get these complex traits evolving by a combination of unlikely events" and that this is "just what creationists say can’t happen."60 The comparison is valid if the units are converted. Comparing head counts without converting is the error in Part 4, and both sides have made it.
9. Adaptive paths usually have steps that pay. This succeeds for the cases where it has been shown. Each of lambda's four mutations improved binding to the old receptor, and six of six tested intermediates "had selective advantages"61. Behe accepts this and says the result is not "beyond the edge of evolution."62 Pyrimethamine resistance was built the same way.63 Chloroquine resistance was not. How common each kind of path is has not been counted by anyone.
10. One-letter regulatory changes are cheap, and humans found the lactase switch at least five times. This succeeds. It is what the price list predicts. One named letter arises about three times in a million people over 240 generations.36 The case shows that small populations find one-step changes. It says nothing about changes of more than one step.
11. Fast change in animals runs on old variation, so the ledger of new mutations misses it. This succeeds as a description. The stickleback alleles were in the sea before the lakes were colonised.28 They still had to arise once. Their age is disputed between the two timelines, and the stickleback article finds that a measured mutation rate makes them older.
12. Drug resistance is a narrow target picked after the fact. Evolution has no target. This succeeds in part. The ledger records answers to a few strong pressures. It does not rescue chloroquine. The whole genome was free to find any answer, and Behe made the point himself: a CCC is "the probability of an effective cluster of mutations arising in an entire organism."1 The objection stands against the extrapolation, because the number of acceptable answers to any problem a mammal faced is unknown.
13. From the creationist side: nothing was gained at all, and the bacteria are still bacteria. This fails. Kuhn wrote that "No gain-in-function mutations were observed in any of the long-term bacterial evolution studies."53 By Behe's own published test the citrate mutation is a gain, and so are lambda's new receptor and the parasite's chloroquine transport. Don Batten's form of the argument counts generations, "equivalent to tens of millions of years of human generations"64. Generations are the wrong unit for the same reason as in objection 1.
What would change the verdict
The benchmark is too pessimistic if:
- A watched population turns DNA that was not a gene into a gene with a measured benefit. The nine newly transcribed stretches in Lenski's flasks are the place to look.65
- A change that needs two unpaid steps is seen to arise far more often than the supply of named pairs allows.
- A census of adaptive paths in mammal genes shows that nearly all of them pay at every step.
- A further well-sampled organism turns out to produce far more per birth than HIV and the malaria parasite. The three rows added in version 2 were this test, and they did not break the benchmark: influenza and SARS-CoV-2 sit at or below HIV, and tuberculosis sits above it only because it had a thousandfold fewer births.
The benchmark is too generous if:
- HIV's 5,000, which counts every fixed change, falls to tens when each change is scored by class.
- The modifications on the table, once assayed, turn out mostly to lower the activity of the protein. Those score zero.
- The lambda result fails to repeat with a receptor that the phage was not already close to binding.
Issues and unanswered questions
- The share of mammal adaptations that needed unpaid steps is unknown. The verdict depends on it.
- HIV has not been scored by class. Its row gives an upper bound and no counts of gain, loss and modification.
- The mammal count assumes today's abundance for 200 million years. No fossil-based estimate of past abundance was found.
- Lenski's row has no nucleotide count. Its one gain scores zero and its tuning changes have not been assayed.
- The effect of two gene copies on a two-step change with a harmful first step has not been computed.
- Lynch's 2007 book was not obtained. His 2003 and 2006 papers state the same argument and were read in full.
- Four sources were read without page numbers, from web or archive copies, and are cited by section. Galtier 2016, Desai 2007, and Lynch and Abegg 2010 were read in abstract only.
- Behe's rate ratio has not been tested by calculation. The inputs would be population size, the two rates and the two selection coefficients.
Verdict
The ledger is sound as a price list. One named letter costs 108 to 1010 births to make and is found by every organism on the table, mammals included. A run of steps that each pay can be climbed in days by a flask of phage. A change that needs more than one step before it pays cost the malaria parasite about 1020 births, and later experiments confirmed why. In every row most of what selection kept was loss or adjustment. No row holds a new gene with a shown benefit.
The extrapolation the series has used is weaker than the ledger. The figure of fewer than 1020 mammals is a guess, and the best count is about 1020 with a tenfold error. The microbes did not out-search the mammals. Counted in mutations and counted per site, all mammals together searched as much as the parasite or more. The microbes on the table are not the high-selection organisms the argument took them for. Output per birth differs by thirteen orders of magnitude between rows, so no rate can be carried from a virus to a mammal.
What survives is narrower and stronger. A mammal genome was built along one lineage, and one lineage never had the births to count on even a single named pair of unpaid changes. The mainstream's own calculation for the human line agrees. Whether that limit bites depends on how much of a mammal genome could be built one paying step at a time, and that has not been measured. Until it is, the benchmark stands as a measured price and not as a proof.
Sources
Each source is listed once under its library key. The entries beneath it give the place and the words relied on. Notes that begin "note-" hold this article's own arithmetic.
- 1.
Behe, Michael J. The Edge of Evolution: The Search for the Limits of Darwinism. Free Press. 2007. Behe is a biochemist at Lehigh University and a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute. The wording was read from the publisher's e-book. Page numbers were pinned on the archive.org scan of the 2007 hardback, item isbn_9780743296205, read by search-inside because the item cannot be borrowed. Printed page equals scan leaf minus 14. That offset was anchored on the scan's own page map at leaf 65, page 51, and leaf 152, page 138, and agrees with the pages Luskin 2019 and Durrett and Schmidt 2009 cite. The scan's text destroys exponents, so exponents are from the e-book.
- 1a.
Page 60: “Species in which there are fewer living organisms than malaria (again, other things being equal) will take proportionately longer to develop a cluster of mutations of the complexity of malaria’s resistance to chloroquine.” Pinned on leaf 74 of the archive.org scan. ↩ ↩
- 1b.
Page 138: “The best current estimate is that a person infected with HIV is burdened with a total of one to ten billion (109 to 1010) virus particles.” “Since there are approximately fifty million people worldwide infected with the virus, the math points to a total of about 1020 copies of the virus having been produced in the past several decades, when HIV became widespread in human populations—roughly the same as the number of malarial cells produced each year.” An endnote marker after the first sentence is left out. Pinned on leaf 152 of the archive.org scan. Exponents are from the e-book. ↩
- 1c.
Page 61: “There are about five thousand species of modern mammals. If each species had an average of a million members, and if a new generation appeared each year, and if this went on for two hundred million years, the likelihood of a single CCC appearing in the whole bunch over that entire time would be only about one in a hundred.” Two endnote markers are left out. 5,000 × 106 × 2 × 108 = 1018. ↩ ↩ ↩
- 1d.
Page 62: “So a CCC isn’t just the odds of a particular protein getting the right mutations; it’s the probability of an effective cluster of mutations arising in an entire organism.” ↩
- 1e.
Page 60: “a generous estimate is that perhaps a trillion creatures have preceded us in the past ten million years.” “The ratio of humanoid creatures in the past ten million years to the number of parasites needed for chloroquine resistance is one to a hundred million.” An endnote marker after the first sentence is left out. Pinned on leaf 74 of the archive.org scan. ↩
- 1a.
- 2.
Lynch, Michael, and John S. Conery. “The origins of genome complexity.” Science 302(5649):1401–1404. Nov 21, 2003. Lynch is a population geneticist, then at Indiana University. Read from the second author's copy of the publisher PDF. The text layer flattens exponents, which were restored from the sense of the text. Mirror: Pages.uoregon.edu
- 2a.
Section Abstract, page 1401: “According to this model, much of the restructuring of eukaryotic genomes was initiated by nonadaptive processes, and this in turn provided novel substrates for the secondary evolution of phenotypic complexity by natural selection. The enormous long-term effective population sizes of prokaryotes may impose a substantial barrier to the evolution of complex genomes and morphologies.” ↩ ↩
- 2b.
Page 1401: “For example, a large population can behave genetically like a small one if a minor fraction of individuals contribute to the reproductive pool or if beneficial chromosomal segments periodically sweep through the population.” ↩
- 2c.
Page 1402: “Second, the majority of unicellular species in Fig. 1 are pathogens, and their genetic effective sizes may be highly influenced by that of their larger host, as in the case of the human malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum.” ↩
- 2d.
Page 1401: “This implies that Ne is generally greater than 108 for prokaryotes and often in the range of 107 to 108 for unicellular eukaryotes.” Page 1402: “implying that Ne is on the order of 104 to 105.” The second quotation is about vertebrates. The paper prints Ne with a subscript e. ↩
- 2a.
- 3.
Times each possible single-letter change arose equals births times the rate for one named change, which is the rate per letter divided by three. HIV: 2 × 10−5 ÷ 3 = 6.7 × 10−6 per round of infection;35 times 6 × 1020 infected cells is 4 × 1015, and times 6 × 1022 particles is 4 × 1017. The published HIV article prints 3.7 × 1017. Malaria parasite, from the parasite article: 2.45 × 10−10 ÷ 3 = 8.2 × 10−11, or one in 1.2 × 1010 parasites;18 times 1.5 to 7.5 × 1021 births is 1.2 to 6.2 × 1011. One named pair in the same parasite in the same generation: (8.2 × 10−11)2 = 6.7 × 10−21, or one in 1.5 × 1020. Lenski's experiment, from its article: 2.5 × 109 mutations per flask ÷ 1.39 × 107 possible changes = 181 per flask, and twelve flasks give about 2,200. Phage lambda, from its article: 7.7 × 10−8 ÷ 3 = 2.6 × 10−8 per named change,26 which over 1.9 × 1010 to 1.2 × 1013 births is 490 to 310,000. Dividing by three treats the three possible changes at a letter as equally likely, which is wrong by up to a factor of two. ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- 4.
Every figure is from the parasite article on this site, except the effective size. Census: about 1017 alive and fewer than 1020 born a year.7 Years: 75, from the early 1950s to 2025.22 Generations: 365.25 ÷ 2 = 182.6 a year, and 75 × 182.6 = 13,700. Births: 75 × 2 × 1019 = 1.5 × 1021 and 75 × 1020 = 7.5 × 1021. Mutations per birth: 2.45 × 10−10 × 2.33 × 107 = 0.0057.18 18 Mutations: 1.5 × 1021 × 0.0057 = 8.6 × 1018 and 7.5 × 1021 × 0.0057 = 4.3 × 1019. Output: 18 amino-acid changes in the most changed form of each gene, and a round upper limit of 100 when alternative forms are counted. 18 ÷ 7.5 × 1021 = 2.4 × 10−21 and 100 ÷ 1.5 × 1021 = 6.7 × 10−20. The gain is chloroquine transport by PfCRT. The loss is the deletion of pfhrp2. Effective size is added by this article.10 ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- 5.
Mauger, Bethany. “'Evolution under a microscope' going strong at MSU.” MSUToday. Nov 11, 2025. A university press release. Used only for the count of generations.
- 6.
Turner, Caroline B. et al. “Evolution of a cross-feeding interaction following a key innovation in a long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli.” Microbiology 169:001390. 2023. Open access. Read from the publisher PDF in the library. Mirror: PMC
- 6a.
Section Discussion: The first sentence of the Discussion says that the ability to grow on citrate in air has so far evolved in only one of the twelve populations, even after 75,000 generations. It is paraphrased here because three reference numbers break up the printed sentence. ↩
- 6a.
- 7.
White, Nicholas J. “Antimalarial drug resistance.” Journal of Clinical Investigation 113(8):1084–1092. Apr 2004. A review by the Mahidol and Oxford malaria clinician. Free to read at the journal. Read from the publisher PDF; page numbers are the printed folios. The PDF text flattens exponents, which were restored from context.
- 7a.
Page 1091: “This is particularly powerful in malaria, because there are only about 1017 malaria parasites in the entire world.” “As there is a cumulative total of less than 1020 malaria parasites in existence in one year, such a simultaneously resistant parasite would arise spontaneously roughly once every 10,000 years”. Page 1087: “these ill people would contain between 5 × 1016 and 5 × 1017 malaria parasites (8).” “we have estimated that there must be less than 3 × 1016 malaria parasites in the world's asymptomatic carriers (Figure 5) (8).” Reference 8 is White and Pongtavornpinyo 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society B 270:545–554, which was not obtained. ↩ ↩
- 7b.
Page 1085: “Resistance to chloroquine in P. falciparum has arisen spontaneously less than ten times in the past fifty years (14). This suggests that the per-parasite probability of developing resistance de novo is on the order of 1 in 1020 parasite multiplications.” Reference 14 is Su, Kirkman, Fujioka and Wellems 1997, Cell 91:593–603. ↩ ↩
- 7c.
Page 1085: “The single point mutations in the gene encoding cytochrome b (cytB), which confer atovaquone resistance, or in the gene encoding dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr), which confer pyrimethamine resistance, have a per-parasite probability of arising de novo of approximately 1 in 1012 parasite multiplications (5).” The sentence after the next says that much higher mutation rates than 1 in 1012 are recorded in the laboratory, citing Rathod, McErlean and Lee 1997. It is paraphrased here because the published sentence contains a misprint. ↩ ↩
- 7a.
- 8.
Meyer, Justin R. et al. “Repeatability and Contingency in the Evolution of a Key Innovation in Phage Lambda.” Science 335(6067):428–432. Jan 27, 2012. Read as the PubMed Central author manuscript (NIHMS362453), both the HTML and the 14-page PDF, which carry identical text. Every page below is an author-manuscript page read from the "Meyer et al. Page N" running head, not a Science page: the published pagination could not be obtained, since the Science PDF is paywalled and Unpaywall and Semantic Scholar list only the PubMed Central copy. Exponents are restored from the sense of the text, because the PDF and HTML both flatten superscripts. Mirror: PMC
- 8a.
Page 2: “The mutants arose and fixed within 8 days, generating highly resistant populations (fig. S1), although the phage did not go extinct but instead persisted at densities of about 106 to 107 phage per ml, or about one phage per 102 to 103 host cells (fig. S2).” Superscripts restored; both the PDF and the HTML print "106 to 107" and "102 to 103". ↩ ↩
- 8b.
Page 4: “The correspondence between the use of the OmpF receptor and the presence of these four mutations, coupled with the observation that phage having only three of the four cannot use OmpF, provides evidence that all four are required for λ to infect through OmpF.” ↩ ↩
- 8c.
Page 4: “As before, only some phage populations (24/96) evolved the ability to use a second receptor. This ability emerged about the same time (median 12 days; range 9–17 days; fig. S4), and all isolates with altered receptor function infected hosts through the OmpF protein.” ↩ ↩
- 8a.
- 9.
Effective sizes are from Lynch's 2023 dataset and Charlesworth's 2009 table.46 10 The two agree within a factor of about two for animals and differ sevenfold for Escherichia coli, 1.7 × 108 against 2.5 × 107. The ratio of the medians for bacteria and vertebrates is 8.88 × 107 ÷ 9.32 × 104 = 950. An effective size is a quotient of diversity by mutation rate, so its second digit depends on which mutation rate is used. ↩ ↩
- 10.
Charlesworth, Brian. “Effective population size and patterns of molecular evolution and variation.” Nature Reviews Genetics 10(3):195–205. Mar 2009. Read from the advance online copy in the library, whose pages are numbered 1 to 11. Printed page equals that number plus 194, which is an inference from the page count and the identical layout.
- 10a.
Table 1, page 199: The table is headed "Effective population size (Ne) estimates from DNA sequence diversities". Its rows include humans 10,400, Drosophila melanogaster 1,150,000, Escherichia coli 25,000,000 and Plasmodium falciparum 210,000–300,000. The parasite's figure is from 204 nuclear genes. ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- 10a.
- 11.
user813801. “How many organisms have ever lived on Earth?” Biology Stack Exchange. Jul 10, 2014. An answer by an anonymous user of a question-and-answer site. Read through a browser session and saved in the library. The published HIV article cites this answer for its count of bacteria. The answer also gives the figure for mammals quoted here.
- 11a.
Section Estimate of number of mammals that ever existed: “1.4410^17 new mice per year 200 million years = 2.88 * 10^25 total mice.” “so the total number is probably about around 4-10 orders of magnitude less than this. So it is probably something like 10^20 total mammals ever existed”. The first figure is an upper limit that covers all land with mice. ↩ ↩
- 11a.
- 12.
First route, from the parasite article: bats are two-thirds of individuals and less than a tenth of 20 million tonnes.54 A tenth of 20 million tonnes is 2 × 109 kg. At an assumed 10 g per bat that is at most 2 × 1011 bats, and 2 × 1011 ÷ (2/3) = 3 × 1011 mammals. Second route: animals under 1 kg are more than 95% of individuals and a fifth of the weight.54 A fifth of 20 million tonnes is 4 × 109 kg. At an assumed mean of 20 g that is 2 × 1011 animals, and 2 × 1011 ÷ 0.95 = 2.1 × 1011 mammals. Both routes then assume one generation a year for 2 × 108 years: 3 × 1011 × 2 × 108 = 6 × 1019 and 2.1 × 1011 × 2 × 108 = 4 × 1019. The body weights, the generation time and the constant abundance are assumptions. The census paper prints no total count of individuals in its main text. Sea mammals are large and few. Livestock are recent. The estimate in the notes behind this series is 5,000 × 5 × 108 = 2.5 × 1012 alive, times 2 × 108 years ÷ 5 years = 4 × 107 generations, which is 1020. ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- 13.
Mammals. Births: 6 × 1019.12 New substitutions per birth: for a mouse, 2 copies × 2.717 × 109 letters × 5.35 × 10−9 = 29;46 for a human, 63.19 Total: 6 × 1019 × 29 = 1.7 × 1021 and 6 × 1019 × 63 = 3.8 × 1021. One named change per birth: mouse 5.35 × 10−9 ÷ 3 × 2 copies = 3.6 × 10−9; human 1.2 × 10−8 ÷ 3 × 2 = 8 × 10−9. Times each arose: 3.6 × 10−9 × 6 × 1019 = 2.2 × 1011 and 8 × 10−9 × 6 × 1019 = 4.8 × 1011. One named pair in the same animal in the same generation: (3.6 × 10−9)2 = 1.3 × 10−17 and (8 × 10−9)2 = 6.4 × 10−17. Times each arose: 780 and 3,800. Malaria parasite: 6.7 × 10−21 × 1.5 to 7.5 × 1021 = 10 to 50.3 HIV: (6.7 × 10−6)2 = 4.4 × 10−11, times 6 × 1020 to 6 × 1022 is 3 × 1010 to 3 × 1012. A named triple in HIV: (6.7 × 10−6)3 = 3 × 10−16, times 6 × 1020 is 1.8 × 105. Pairs built in two steps, with the first change waiting in the population, arise more often than pairs arising together. How much more often depends on whether the first change is harmful. Treating all mammals as one genome is a simplification. ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- 14.
One lineage: an assumed census of 106 to 109 for an assumed 108 generations, which is 200 million years at two years each, gives 1014 to 1017 births. Mutations: 1014 × 29 = 3 × 1015 and 1017 × 63 = 6 × 1018. Times each single-letter change arose: 3.6 × 10−9 × 1014 = 3.6 × 105 and 8 × 10−9 × 1017 = 8 × 108. Times each named pair arose together: 1.3 × 10−17 × 1014 = 0.0013 and 6.4 × 10−17 × 1017 = 6.4.13 Births needed for one named pair: 1 ÷ 6.4 × 10−17 = 1.6 × 1016 and 1 ÷ 1.3 × 10−17 = 7.7 × 1016. On Behe's count of 1018 mammals: 1018 × 1.3 × 10−17 = 13 and 1018 × 6.4 × 10−17 = 64. On his count of 1012 ancestors in the human line: 1012 × 6.4 × 10−17 = 6 × 10−5. ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- 15.
Durrett, Rick, and Deena Schmidt. “Waiting for two mutations: with applications to regulatory sequence evolution and the limits of Darwinian evolution.” Genetics 180:1501–1509. Nov 2008. Two mathematicians at Cornell. Read from the publisher PDF in the library.
- 15a.
Section Abstract, page 1501: “Consistent with recent experimental observations for Drosophila, we find that a few million years is sufficient, but for humans with a much smaller effective population size, this type of change would take >100 million years.” Page 1507: “Multiplying by 25 years per generation gives 216 million years.” The change meant is a pair of mutations, the first of which inactivates a binding site and the second of which creates a new one. The same page gives 162 million years from simulation. The PDF text prints the greater-than sign as a full stop. ↩ ↩
- 15a.
- 16.
Rambaut, Andrew et al. “The causes and consequences of HIV evolution.” Nature Reviews Genetics 5:52–61. Jan 2004. A review. Read from a course copy of the publisher PDF. Page numbers are from the running feet. Reference numbers inside the quotations are left out. Mirror: Pages.stat.wisc.edu
- 16a.
Page 56: “Strikingly, intra-host and inter-host evolution seem to be very different processes, with positive selection dominating in the former but not the latter.” ↩
- 16b.
Page 56: “First, the virus experiences a high rate of mutation, with reverse transcriptase making ~0.2 errors per genome during each replication cycle”. “it has a viral generation time of ~2.5 days and produces ~1010–1012 new”. Page 52: “an estimated 42 million people carrying the virus at present”. The second quotation ends before the word virions, which the journal prints in small capitals as a glossary term. Exponents restored; the text layer prints 1010–1012. ↩ ↩
- 16c.
Page 57: “the recombination rate of HIV is one of the highest of all organisms, with an estimated three recombination events occurring per genome per replication cycle”. ↩
- 16d.
Page 56: “Most fixed env amino-acid changes in these patients confer a selective advantage, with an average of one adaptive fixation event every ~2.5 months. Under these criteria, HIV shows stronger positive selection than any other organism studied so far.” ↩
- 16a.
- 17.
Lenski, Richard E. et al. “Long-term experimental evolution in Escherichia coli. I. Adaptation and divergence during 2,000 generations.” The American Naturalist 138:1315–1341. 1991. The founding paper of the experiment. The library copy is a scan without a text layer. The quotation was verified by the author of the experiment's article on this site from a fresh reading of pages 1315 to 1320.
- 18.
Hamilton, William L. et al. “Extreme mutation bias and high AT content in Plasmodium falciparum.” Nucleic Acids Research 45(4):1889–1901. 2017. Open access, CC BY. Read from the Europe PMC full text, which has no page numbers. ELC in the quotations means one erythrocytic life cycle of 48 hours, and BPS means base-pair substitution. Mirror: PMC
- 18a.
Section Materials and Methods: “we divided μ1 by the total genome size of P. falciparum (G), 2.33 × 107 bp”. The source prints μ with a subscript 1. ↩ ↩
- 18b.
Section Materials and Methods: “the mean overall BPS rate per ELC per bp for all clone trees (2.45 × 10−10 BPS/ELC/bp)”. Table 1: Per-isolate means in units of 10−10: 3D7 2.10, HB3 2.95, Dd2 3.20, KH1-01 2.27, KH2-01 1.64. A sixth isolate, W2, had too few clones for a rate. In all, 279 clones were sequenced and 85 substitutions found. ↩ ↩ ↩
- 18a.
- 19.
Kong, Augustine et al. “Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father's age to disease risk.” Nature 488(7412):471–475. Aug 23, 2012. Read from the author manuscript, which has no journal page numbers. The senior author is Kari Stefansson. Mirror: PMC
- 19a.
Section Abstract: “Here we show that in our samples, with an average father’s age of 29.7, the average de novo mutation rate is 1.20×10−8 per nucleotide per generation.” Section Results: “a total of 4,933 de novo mutations, or an average of 63.2 per trio, were called.” A trio is two parents and a child, so 63.2 is the count per child. ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- 19a.
- 20.
Wielgoss, Sébastien et al. “Mutation rate inferred from synonymous substitutions in a long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli.” G3 1:183–186. 2011. Open access. Read from the publisher PDF in the library. Mirror: PMC
- 21.
Every figure is from the published HIV article on this site unless marked. Carriers: 42 million.16 Particles: 1011 made per person per day, and at most 109 cells infected.34 Alive at once: 4.2 × 107 × 1011 = 4 × 1018. Generations: 100 years at 2.6 days, about 14,000; the 2.6 days is from Perelson and colleagues 1996, which was not re-read, and Rambaut gives about 2.5. Births are counted over 40 years, 14,600 days: 14,600 × 1011 × 4.2 × 107 = 6.1 × 1022 particles. Mutations per round of infection: 2 × 10−5 × 9,181 letters = 0.18.35 Mutations: 6.1 × 1022 × 0.18 = 1.1 × 1022. The figures by infected cells are this article's: 14,600 × 109 × 4.2 × 107 = 6.1 × 1020 cells, and × 0.18 = 1.1 × 1020 mutations. Both counts assume 42 million carriers for all 40 years, which is too many for the early years. Effective size: the HIV article reports 450 to 105 per patient from a table in Althaus and colleagues 2005, which was not re-read. Output: the HIV article counts about 5,160 changes fixed in the groups of HIV since it entered humans and takes 5,000 as an upper bound on constructive ones. 5,000 ÷ 6 × 1022 = 8 × 10−20 per particle, and 5,000 ÷ 6 × 1020 = 8 × 10−18 per infected cell. ↩ ↩ ↩
- 22.
Payne, D. “Spread of chloroquine resistance in Plasmodium falciparum.” Parasitology Today 3(8):241–246. Aug 1987. Read in abstract only, from the Europe PMC record. The full text is behind a paywall and was not obtained.
- 22a.
Section Abstract: “The drug was introduced in 1934, but was not in large-scale use until the early 1950s. Anecdotal reports suggest that resistance emerged as early as 1957 both in Colombia and along the then Cambodia-Thailand border area. But by 1960, resistance in these areas was confirmed - and may represent two separate events.” ↩ ↩
- 22a.
- 23.
Every figure is from the experiment's article on this site. Each flask holds 10 mL at about 5 × 107 cells per mL, and 1% is moved to fresh medium daily.17 Births per flask per day: 5 × 108 − 5 × 106 = 4.95 × 108. Days: 82,000 generations ÷ 6.64 = 12,342.5 Births: 6.1 × 1012 per flask and 7.3 × 1013 for twelve. Mutations: 6.1 × 1012 × 4.1 × 10−4 = 2.5 × 109 per flask and 3.0 × 1010 for twelve.20 That uses the ancestor's rate. Six of the twelve populations later raised their mutation rate about a hundredfold, so the true total is higher. Births are an upper estimate, because evolved cells are larger and reach lower densities. Effective size: about 107.49 Losses: all twelve populations lost the ability to use ribose within 2,000 generations.41 The citrate gain counts zero nucleotides because the promoter and the gene it was joined to both existed already. The experiment's article reports, from Van Hofwegen and colleagues 2016, that citrate use arose in as little as 19 days when cultures were left to starve between weekly transfers. ↩ ↩ ↩
- 24.
Every figure is from the lambda article on this site, except the total of mutations. Phage stood at 106 to 107 per mL in 10 mL flasks.8 A later paper by the same laboratory used 6.3 × 109 per flask.25 With a 1% daily transfer the births per day are about one flask-full. Per successful flask, twelve days to the median success: 107 × 12 = 1.2 × 108 and 6.3 × 109 × 12 = 7.6 × 1010. For all 96 flasks over 20 days: 107 × 20 × 96 = 1.9 × 1010 and 6.3 × 109 × 20 × 96 = 1.2 × 1013. Mutations per genome per copy: 0.0038.26 Mutations for all 96 flasks are this article's product: 7.2 × 107 and 4.6 × 1010. Origins: 24 of 96 flasks,8 and 1 of 6 in an earlier run, so 25 of 102. Nucleotides: four, all required.8 Per birth, successful flasks only: 4 ÷ 7.6 × 1010 = 5 × 10−11 and 4 ÷ 1.2 × 108 = 3 × 10−8. Counting the flasks that failed lowers both about fourfold. No effective size or count of generations was published. ↩ ↩ ↩
- 25.
Gupta, Animesh et al. “Host-parasite coevolution promotes innovation through deformations in fitness landscapes.” eLife 11:e76162. 2022. CC BY 4.0. Read as the eLife PDF from PubMed Central; locators are that PDF's own "N of 22" footer pages. Mirror: PMC
- 25a.
Page 5: “(960 generations; ~6.3×109 λ particles, Figure 4—figure supplement 1; Meyer et al., 2012) and λ’s intrinsic mutation rate (7.7×10-8 base-1 replication-1) (Drake, 1991).” Page 15: “we decided to run the simulation for a somewhat arbitrary amount of time, 960 generations which corresponds to two doublings per hour for the 20-day experiment we are trying to replicate”. Superscripts restored from the journal XML; the PDF text layer prints them inline. These are the authors' simulation inputs, not a per-flask census. ↩ ↩
- 25a.
- 26.
Drake, John W. et al. “Rates of spontaneous mutation.” Genetics 148(4):1667–1686. 1998. sources/papers/drake-1998_rates-of-spontaneous-mutation.pdf, publisher PDF with printed folios. Gupta et al. 2022 use the same lambda rate, citing Drake 1991, which this paper updates. Mirror: PMC
- 26a.
Page 1670, table 4: The row for bacteriophage lambda gives genome size 4.9 × 104 bases, mutations per base pair per replication 7.7 × 10-8, and mutations per genome per replication 0.0038. The row for Escherichia coli in the same table gives 5.4 × 10-10 per base pair per replication, which is where the ratio of about 140 comes from. Not quoted verbatim, because the PDF text layer renders the times sign as a digit and drops the superscript minus; the values are read against the table's own column headings. The table's footnote reads "Values are from Drake (1991), excluding the two well defined outliers and updated slightly as described in the text." ↩ ↩ ↩
- 26a.
- 27.
Every figure is from the stickleback article on this site. About 3,000 sea-run fish were put into each of two Alaskan lakes, Cheney in 2009 and Scout in 2011, and sampled to 2017.28 Fish-generations at one year each: 3,000 × 8 + 3,000 × 6 = 42,000. This is a floor, because the populations grew. Mutations per fish: 5.11 × 10−9 × 2 × 463 million letters = 4.73.29 Mutations: 42,000 × 4.73 = 2 × 105. The samples were pools of 100 fish, which could not have detected a new variant, so the absence of new adaptive variants is not a measured zero. The older changes are the Pitx1 deletions, scored as a loss, and changes at Eda, Bmp6 and Fads2, scored as modifications. ↩ ↩
- 28.
Roberts Kingman, Garrett A. et al. “Predicting Future from Past: The Genomic Basis of Recurrent and Rapid Stickleback Evolution.” Science Advances 7(25). Jun 18, 2021. Read from the PMC copy, which has no page numbers, so claims give section headings. CC BY-NC. The supplement was not read. Article number eabg5285. Mirror: PMC
- 28a.
Section Rapid contemporary evolution and TempoPeak identification: “This marked congruity strongly suggests that the ancient SGV represented by Pacific EcoPeaks is the primary genomic feature enabling extremely fast evolution of freshwater phenotypes in stickleback from the northeast Pacific basin.” ↩ ↩
- 28b.
Section Rapid contemporary evolution and TempoPeak identification: “Bell et al. (47) introduced ~3000 anadromous RS fish into each of two other Cook Inlet lakes without outlets that had been similarly treated to exterminate fish: Cheney Lake (CH) in 2009 and Scout Lake (SC) in 2011. Low–armor-plated (~5 to 7 plates per side) stickleback began to appear in the second and third generation after founding in CH and SC respectively, and, by 2017, they had increased to 20 to 30% (Fig. 2B).” ↩ ↩
- 28a.
- 29.
Zhang, Chaowei et al. “Rate of De Novo Mutations in the Three-Spined Stickleback.” Heredity 134(7):387–395. 2025. Read from the PMC copy. CC BY. Mirror: PMC
- 29a.
Section Results: “After applying a series of filters, 115 unique de novo mutations (DNMs) were detected”. “The overall average per-generation point DNM rate was estimated to be µ = 5.11 × 10^−9/bp/gen (95% confidence interval: 4.08–6.14 × 10^−9/bp/gen, with zero-inflated method being 5.07 × 10^−9/bp/gen)”. “Assuming a generation time of 3 years for the marine three-spined sticklebacks, the yearly mutation rate would be, on average, 1.70 × 10^−9/bp/year.” ↩ ↩
- 29a.
- 30.
Every figure is from the article on malaria resistance alleles on this site, except the total of mutations. The exposed population is assumed, at 106, 107 or 108, because no census of malarial regions in past millennia exists. Generations: 7,500 to 10,000 years at 25 years each.56 Births: 106 × 300 = 3 × 108 and 108 × 400 = 4 × 1010. Mutations are this article's product with 63.2 per child:19 1.9 × 1010 and 2.5 × 1012. Effective size: 10,400 in Charlesworth's table and 22,118 in Lynch's dataset.10 46 Gains: sickle haemoglobin, haemoglobin E and the glycophorin rearrangement called DUP4, the last two each scored as gain with loss. Losses: G6PD deficiency, Duffy negativity, the thalassaemias and Southeast Asian ovalocytosis. Modification: haemoglobin C. Nucleotides: one each for haemoglobins S, E and C, and none for DUP4, which was made by rearrangement. For scale only: 3 ÷ 4 × 1010 = 8 × 10−11 and 3 ÷ 3 × 108 = 10−8 per birth. Those figures are not in the table because the births are assumed. ↩ ↩
- 31.
Every figure is from the influenza article on this site. Target cells in one adult upper respiratory tract: 4 × 108. Particles released per infected cell: about 15,000, a cell-culture figure at high multiplicity. Genomes per infection: 6 × 1010 to 6 × 1012, on an assumption that between 1% and 100% of the cell pool is infected; that assumption is the ledger's largest uncertainty and it is the article's own. Cases a year: about 1 billion. Genomes a year: 6 × 1019 to 6 × 1021. The century total corrects for a world holding 1.8 billion people in 1918 and 8.2 billion now, giving 3 × 1021 to 3 × 1023. Mutations per replicated genome: 2 to 3, measured by a twelve-class fluctuation test, so 7 × 1021 to 1 × 1024 in total. Genome 13,500 bases. Output: nine new glycosylation sites at one to three nucleotides each, about seven positions behind the major antigenic jumps, four carrying the drug resistances, and ten separating the 1918 polymerases from avian ones, which is about thirty distinct positions; counting every adaptive substitution that fixed instead gives 100 to 300. The gain is the glycosylation sites. The census figure overstates the effective search badly: the transmission bottleneck is one or two genomes, and about 1011 lineages ever crossed from one person to another. ↩ ↩
- 32.
Every figure is from the SARS-CoV-2 article on this site. Infections plus reinfections to 14 November 2021: 3.80 × 109, itself a lower bound. Virions produced per infection: 1012 to 3 × 1013, the arithmetic mean rather than the median. Births: 3.8 × 1021 to 1.1 × 1023. Genome 29,903 bases, so 89,709 possible single substitutions. Mutation rate 1.3 × 10−6 per base per replication cycle, giving 0.0389 mutations per genome copied and 1.5 × 1020 to 4.4 × 1021 in total. Output: 12 to under 100 nucleotides. Nothing in the record scores as a gain. Transmission bottleneck 1 to 8 virions. ↩ ↩
- 33.
Every figure is from the tuberculosis article on this site. Bacilli in one adult with cavitary disease: 107 to 109, taken as 108; that figure is the article's own, anchored on sputum counts rather than measured directly. Cases: 10.7 million in 2024. Drug era: about 80 years, from streptomycin in 1944. Births: 3 × 1018 to 3 × 1020. Genome 4,411,529 base pairs. Mutation rate 2.01 × 10−10 to 2.01 × 10−9 per base pair per generation, the range being how slowly the bacillus divides inside the body, so 0.0009 to 0.009 mutations per bacillus born and 3 × 1015 to 3 × 1017 in the drug era, by two routes that agree. Each of the 1.32 × 107 possible single changes arose about 7.6 × 108 times. A named pair in one cell in one generation is one in 2.2 × 1020, so about 0.05 such events in the whole drug era. Output: 1 to about 30 nucleotides. Nothing scores as a gain. Generation time in the body is somewhere between 1 and 10 days and is not known, so no generation count is printed. ↩ ↩
- 34.
Coffin, John, and Ronald Swanstrom. “HIV pathogenesis: dynamics and genetics of viral populations and infected cells.” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine 3(1):a012526. Jan 2013. A review by two HIV researchers. Read from the PubMed Central page, which has no page numbers.
- 34a.
Section Factors of HIV-1 Evolution, Drift: “In the case of viral populations, it is important to bear in mind that the population size is determined by the number of cells infected at each round of replication, not by the number of virions produced by them. In the case of HIV-1 infection, perhaps 1011 virions are produced daily; the number of cells infected in the same time span is still a matter of some debate, but is unlikely to exceed 109.” ↩ ↩
- 34a.
- 35.
Zanini, Fabio et al. “In vivo mutation rates and the landscape of fitness costs of HIV-1.” Virus Evolution 3(1). 2017. Article number vex003. Open access, CC BY. Read from the Europe PMC full text, which has no page numbers. Mirror: PMC
- 35a.
Section Abstract: “At approximately neutral sites, mutations accumulate with a rate of 1.2 × 10−5 per site per day, in agreement with the rate measured in cell cultures.” Section 1. Introduction: “a total rate of about 2 × 10−5 mutations per site per replication cycle is reported.” The second figure is the authors' report of earlier work in cell culture. A replication cycle is one round of infection of a cell. ↩ ↩ ↩
- 35a.
- 36.
Each figure is from the article linked in the row. Lactase: Tishkoff and colleagues name four variants,57 and the lactase article adds a fifth and scores it as a candidate gain. Each is one letter. That article computes that the European letter arises about three times in a million people over 240 generations. Beta-lactamase: five changes, four in the protein and one in the control region, raise resistance to cefotaxime about 46,000-fold.37 NylB: two single-letter changes separate the active enzyme from its nearly inactive twin.38 Which of the two forms is older has not been shown. ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- 37.
Weinreich, Daniel M. et al. “Darwinian Evolution Can Follow Only Very Few Mutational Paths to Fitter Proteins.” Science 312(5770):111–114. Apr 7, 2006. Paywalled at the publisher and reported closed by Unpaywall, OpenAlex, Europe PMC and Semantic Scholar's public API. The full text was obtained from a Wayback capture of a university course mirror of the publisher PDF, with printed folios 111 to 114 in the running feet. The library previously held the abstract only. The PDF interleaves with an unrelated economics Report, so each page was extracted separately, and Table 1 was read off a 110 dpi page image because pdftotext destroys its exponents. Mirror: Archive.org
- 37a.
Page 112: “Applying this population genetic reasoning (12) to the data in Table 1 reveals that 102 of the 120 mutational trajectories from TEM wt to TEM* are selectively inaccessible.” “Rather, four mutations have negligible or even negative effects on drug resistance in some combinations.” ↩ ↩
- 37b.
Page 111: “These consist of four missense mutations [A42G, E104K, M182T, and G238S; numbering as in (8)] at clinically important residues (3, 9) and one 5′ noncoding mutation [g4205a; numbering as in (4)], and we denote this high-resistance quintuple mutant TEM*.” The paper's square brackets are reproduced. The fifth change is not in the protein; it raises expression about 2.5-fold. ↩ ↩
- 37a.
- 38.
Kato, Ko et al. “Amino acid alterations essential for increasing the catalytic activity of the nylon-oligomer-degradation enzyme of Flavobacterium sp.” European Journal of Biochemistry 200(1):165–169. 1991. Free to read at the publisher. EII is NylB and EII' is NylB'. Copyright.
- 38a.
Page 168: “An alteration, Gly181 → Asp, is made by a single nucleotide substitution (G to A) at the second base in the codon, and His266 → Asn by a substitution (C to A) at the first base in the codon. While the nylB and nylB' genes have diverged from their common antecedent in the evolutionary process, the 140 base substitutions should have been accumulated in the 1176-bp of the coding regions [5].” The scan's text layer prints the arrows as "-+". ↩ ↩
- 38a.
- 39.
Blount, Zachary D. et al. “Historical contingency and the evolution of a key innovation in an experimental population of Escherichia coli.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:7899–7906. 2008. Read from the publisher PDF in the library. PDF page 2 carries the printed page number 7900.
- 39a.
Page 7900: “This ratio implies, to a first approximation, that each population tried every typical one-step mutation many times.” ↩
- 39a.
- 40.
Behe, Michael J. “Experimental Evolution, Loss-of-Function Mutations, and "The First Rule of Adaptive Evolution".” The Quarterly Review of Biology 85(4):419–445. Dec 2010. Behe is a professor of biological sciences at Lehigh University and a senior fellow of the Discovery Institute. Read from the library PDF, a Wayback Machine copy of the author's own posting. Every page prints its number in the running head. The paper is set in two columns, so each page was extracted in reading order before any quotation was checked. Copyright. Mirror: Archive.org
- 40a.
Page 439: “the rate of appearance of an adaptive mutation that would arise from the diminishment or elimination of the activity of a protein is expected to be 100–1000 times the rate of appearance of an adaptive mutation that requires specific changes to a gene.” ↩
- 40a.
- 41.
Cooper, Vaughn S. et al. “Mechanisms causing rapid and parallel losses of ribose catabolism in evolving populations of Escherichia coli B.” Journal of Bacteriology 183(9):2834–2841. 2001. Read from the publisher PDF in the library.
- 42.
Couce, Alejandro et al. “Changing fitness effects of mutations through long-term bacterial evolution.” Science 383. 2024. Article number eadd1417. Eight authors, among them Richard Lenski and Olivier Tenaillon. Read as the author manuscript in the library. Copyright.
- 42a.
Page 12: “To that end, we assumed that nonsense, frameshift, deletions, and insertions cause losses of function. We find that these presumptive inactivating mutations contribute most (>50%) of the early adaptive mutations in the LTEE, and they continue to be a sizable fraction over the long run (~25%, Fig. S18B).” Page 12 of the author manuscript. The classes are presumed from the type of mutation and were not assayed. ↩
- 42a.
- 43.
Gabryszewski, Stanislaw J. et al. “Combinatorial Genetic Modeling of pfcrt-Mediated Drug Resistance Evolution in Plasmodium falciparum.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 33(6):1554–1570. 2016. Open access, CC BY-NC. Read from the Europe PMC full text, which has no page numbers, so places are given by section. CQR is chloroquine resistance and md-CQ is the drug's main breakdown product. Mirror: PMC
- 43a.
Section Discussion, paragraph 2: “As the fixation of pfcrt alleles bearing one to three mutations has not been documented in the field, we hypothesize that pfcrt-mediated CQR arose through mutational bursts with brief periods of intervening growth, whereby one or more mutations were acquired and expanded during a short time window prior to the acquisition of additional mutations. Based on our combined IC50 and growth data, the most likely scenario would be the near-simultaneous emergence of three to four mutations.” The source prints IC50 with a subscript. ↩
- 43a.
- 44.
Ohta, Tomoko. “The nearly neutral theory of molecular evolution.” Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23:263–286. 1992. Read from the publisher PDF in the library. Page numbers are from the running heads.
- 44a.
Page 266: “Thus, a codon bias in mammals appears to be largely determined by mutation pressure, but the bias in lower organisms with intermediate GC content such as in E. coli is influenced by selection because of the efficient selection in very large populations (102).” ↩
- 44a.
- 45.
Lynch, Michael. “The origins of eukaryotic gene structure.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 23(2):450–468. Feb 2006. Free to read at the journal. Read from the publisher's web page through a browser session and saved in the library. The web page has no page numbers. Lynch writes N with a subscript l for the long-term effective size.
- 45a.
Section Introduction: “Second, I will summarize several sets of empirical data that show that the efficiency of natural selection declines dramatically between prokaryotes, unicellular eukaryotes, and multicellular eukaryotes.” ↩
- 45b.
Section The Three Genomic Perils of Increased Organism Size: “Despite these uncertainties, it is clear that the disparity in N l across all domains of life is nearly 20 orders of magnitude less than the disparity in absolute numbers, a pattern that is consistent with a significant stochastic role of genetic draft in large populations.” ↩
- 45c.
Section The Three Genomic Perils of Increased Organism Size: “Across a phylogenetically diverse set of a species, there is a strong correlation between the mutation rate per generation and genome size”. “the extremes being 5.0 × 10−10 and 5.4 × 10−8 /bp/generation for prokaryotes and vertebrates, respectively.” The words "set of a species" are the source's. A figure reference between the two quotations is left out. ↩
- 45d.
Section The Three Genomic Perils of Increased Organism Size: “small population size, tight linkage, and high background mutational activity—are jointly exacerbated as organisms increase in size, producing a synergism that causes substantial reductions in the efficiency of natural selection.” ↩
- 45a.
- 46.
Lynch, Michael et al. “The divergence of mutation rates and spectra across the Tree of Life.” EMBO Reports 24(10):e57561. 2023. Open access. The figures used are from its Dataset EV1, a spreadsheet saved in the library. Mirror: PMC
- 46a.
Tables Dataset EV1, sheet Mutation Rates: 144 species have both a measured mutation rate and a measured diversity. Effective size runs from 10,856 in the vervet monkey to 2.69 × 109 in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Medians by group are 8.88 × 107 for 30 bacteria and 9.32 × 104 for 68 vertebrates. The row for Homo sapiens gives 22,118. The row for Mus musculus gives a mutation rate of 5.35 × 10−9 per site per generation, a genome of 2,717 million bases and an effective size of 163,119. The medians were computed for the Population Genetics article on this site. ↩ ↩ ↩ ↩
- 46a.
- 47.
Lynch, Michael, and Adam Abegg. “The rate of establishment of complex adaptations.” Molecular Biology and Evolution 27(6):1404–1414. Jun 2010. Read from the publisher's web page in the library, which has no page numbers.
- 47a.
Section Abstract: “In general, even in the face of deleterious intermediate steps, the time to establishment is minimized in populations with very large size.” ↩
- 47a.
- 48.
Sanford, John et al. “Mendel's Accountant: a biologically realistic forward-time population genetics program.” Scalable Computing: Practice and Experience 8(2):147–165. 2007. Sanford is a plant geneticist and the author of Genetic Entropy. Read from the journal's PDF. Page numbers are from the running heads.
- 48a.
Page 152: “For organisms with smaller genomes such as yeast, which has a value for G on the order of 107, the minimum absolute effect is larger. This is consistent with the expectation that each nucleotide in a smaller genome on average plays a greater relative role in the organism’s fitness.” G is the size of the genome in nucleotides. Exponent restored. ↩
- 48a.
- 49.
Good, Benjamin H. et al. “The dynamics of molecular evolution over 60,000 generations.” Nature 551:45–50. 2017. Read from the author manuscript in the library. Pages given are manuscript pages from the running head and not journal pages.
- 49a.
Page 4: “When beneficial mutations are common, mutations that would otherwise drive selective sweeps can be outcompeted by other lineages carrying superior beneficial mutations”. A reference number follows. ↩
- 49b.
Page 3: “With an effective population size of Ne~107, new mutations would require Δt ~ 0.1Ne ~ 106 generations to reach the 10% detection threshold by genetic drift alone”. Exponents restored; the text layer prints 107 and 106. A reference number follows the sentence. ↩ ↩
- 49a.
- 50.
Desai, Michael M. et al. “The speed of evolution and maintenance of variation in asexual populations.” Current Biology 17(5):385–394. 2007. Read from the author manuscript in the library. The page given is a manuscript page and not a journal page.
- 50a.
Section Abstract, page 1: “Our analysis predicts that the variation in fitness that a continuously evolving population maintains increases as the logarithm of the population size and logarithm of the mutation rate, yielding a similar logarithmic increase in the speed of evolution.” ↩
- 50a.
- 51.
Karasov, Talia et al. “Evidence that adaptation in Drosophila is not limited by mutation at single sites.” PLoS Genetics 6(6):e1000924. Jun 2010. Open access, CC BY. Read from the Europe PMC full text, which has no page numbers.
- 51a.
Section Abstract: “This discrepancy arises because estimates of the effective population size are generally derived from levels of standing variation and thus reveal long-term population dynamics dominated by sharp—even if infrequent—bottlenecks. The short-term effective population sizes relevant for strong adaptation, on the other hand, might be much closer to census population sizes.” ↩
- 51a.
- 52.
Galtier, Nicolas. “Adaptive protein evolution in animals and the effective population size hypothesis.” PLoS Genetics 12(1):e1005774. Jan 11, 2016. Open access, CC BY. Read from the publisher PDF in the library.
- 52a.
Section Abstract, page 1: “The proportion of adaptive amino-acid substitution is found to be positively correlated to species effective population size. This relationship, however, appears to be primarily driven by a decreased rate of nearly-neutral amino-acid substitution because of more efficient purifying selection in large populations. Our results reveal that adaptive processes dominate the evolution of proteins in most animal species, but do not corroborate the hypothesis that adaptive substitutions accumulate at a faster rate in large populations.” ↩
- 52a.
- 53.
Kuhn, Joseph A. “Dissecting Darwinism.” Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings 25(1):41–47. Jan 2012. Kuhn is a surgeon. Read from the PubMed Central page, which has no page numbers.
- 53a.
Section Transitional species data: “Evolutionary biology can be modeled over a relatively short time (30 years), while observing DNA mutations over 1020 generations (40). This is analogous to observing mutations in man or any mammal over 200 million years.” “No gain-in-function mutations were observed in any of the long-term bacterial evolution studies.” Kuhn's 1020 is a count of organisms and not of generations. His source for the second sentence is Behe 2010. ↩ ↩
- 53a.
- 54.
Greenspoon, Lior et al. “The global biomass of wild mammals.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120(10):e2204892120. 2023. Open access. Read from the Europe PMC full text, which has no page numbers. The paper does not print a total count of individuals in its main text. Mirror: PMC
- 54a.
Section Abstract: “We present a detailed assessment, arriving at a total wet biomass of ≈20 million tonnes (Mt) for all terrestrial wild mammals (95% CI 13-38 Mt), i.e., ≈3 kg per person on earth.” Section Results: “Bats (Chiroptera), for example, comprise one-fifth of species and two-thirds in terms of individual mammals, but only contribute less than one-tenth of the total biomass of wild land mammals”. ↩ ↩
- 54b.
Section Results: “species with a body mass below 1 kg, while comprising >95% of all individuals, contribute only one-fifth to the total biomass”. ↩ ↩
- 54a.
- 55.
Bar-On, Yinon M. et al. “The biomass distribution on Earth.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(25):6506–6511. 2018. Open access. Read from the Europe PMC full text in the library, which has no page numbers. Mirror: PMC
- 55a.
Section The Impact of Humanity on the Biosphere: “The biomass of wild land mammals before this period of extinction was estimated by Barnosky (30) at ≈0.02 Gt C. The present-day biomass of wild land mammals is approximately sevenfold lower, at ≈0.003 Gt C”. Gt C is billions of tonnes of carbon. The period meant is the loss of large land mammals between about 50,000 and 3,000 years ago on the standard timeline. ↩
- 55a.
- 56.
Hedrick, Philip W. “Population genetics of malaria resistance in humans.” Heredity 107:283–304. 2011. A review by a population geneticist at Arizona State University. Library PDF. PDF page N = printed page 282 + N, and every page prints its folio in the running head, which is how each locator below was fixed. Two-column; extracted a page at a time with pdftotext without -layout. Where a number comes from a study Hedrick reviews rather than from his own work, the primary is named in the quotation.
- 56a.
Page 286: “It appears that many of the genetic variants that provide resistance to severe malaria that have been dated are recent, not ancient, polymorphisms and that they have arisen in the last 5000–10 000 years or less (see Table 2).” The sentence begins at the foot of p. 285; the quoted words are on p. 286. ↩ ↩
- 56a.
- 57.
Tishkoff, Sarah A. et al. “Convergent adaptation of human lactase persistence in Africa and Europe.” Nature Genetics 39(1):31–40. Jan 2007. University of Maryland. Read from the PubMed Central author manuscript in the library; locators are sections and Table 1. Mirror: PMC
- 57a.
Section Discussion, Convergent evolution of LP-associated variants: “These data suggest that at least two, and probably four or more, distinct causal variants associated with lactase persistence (T-13910 in Europeans and C-14010, G-13907 and G-13915 in Africans) have evolved independently in European and African populations owing to convergent evolution in response to a strong selective force, adult milk consumption.” ↩ ↩
- 57a.
- 58.
Wootton, John C. et al. “Genetic diversity and chloroquine selective sweeps in Plasmodium falciparum.” Nature 418:320–323. Jul 18, 2002. Read in abstract only, from the Europe PMC record. The full text is behind a paywall and was not obtained.
- 58a.
Section Abstract: “This disequilibrium and its decay rate in the pfcrt-flanking region are consistent with strong directional selective sweeps occurring over only approximately 20-80 sexual generations, especially a single resistant pfcrt haplotype spreading to very high frequencies throughout most of Asia and Africa.” ↩
- 58a.
- 59.
Volkman, Sarah K. et al. “A genome-wide map of diversity in Plasmodium falciparum.” Nature Genetics 39(1):113–119. Jan 2007. Read in abstract only, from the Europe PMC record. The abstract does not name the chromosome. Lozovsky and colleagues, who cite this paper, place the region on chromosome 13.
- 59a.
Section Abstract: “We identified multiple regions with signatures of selective sweeps in drug-resistant parasites, including a previously unidentified 160-kb region with extremely low polymorphism in pyrimethamine-resistant parasites.” ↩
- 59a.
- 60.
Holmes, Bob. “Bacteria make major evolutionary shift in the lab.” New Scientist. Jun 9, 2008. A news report on Blount, Borland and Lenski 2008. Read through a browser session and saved in the library.
- 60a.
Paragraph last: ““The thing I like most is it says you can get these complex traits evolving by a combination of unlikely events,” he says. “That’s just what creationists say can’t happen.”” The speaker is Jerry Coyne of the University of Chicago. ↩
- 60a.
- 61.
Burmeister, Alita R. et al. “Host coevolution alters the adaptive landscape of a virus.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B 283:20161528. 2016. CC BY 4.0. Read as the publisher PDF from PubMed Central, nine pages numbered from 1, with the full text cross-checked against the Europe PMC XML. Mirror: PMC
- 61a.
Page 1: “All six intermediates showed large increases in their adsorption rates on the ancestral host.” Page 7: “These data demonstrate that all six of the independently evolved phage genotypes had selective advantages, even before their descendants had gained the ability to use the OmpF receptor.” “Four of the six evolved intermediate phage genotypes (A12, A7, D9 and G9) were significantly more fit than their common ancestor on the ancestral host cells”. The first quotation is from the abstract on p. 1. ↩
- 61a.
- 62.
Behe, Michael J. “Can't Anybody Here Make Distinctions?” Evolution News (now Science and Culture Today). Apr 12, 2019. Retrieved Sep 27, 2026. The fourth of Behe's replies to Richard Lenski's blog series on Darwin Devolves, and his only direct answer to the lambda experiment. Fetched by curl of the evolutionnews.org address, which redirects to scienceandculture.com; date read from the page's datePublished metadata. Saved as sources/web/behe-2019b_cant-anybody-here-make-distinctions.html. Locators are the post's own section headings.
- 62a.
Section Solid and Interesting: “What’s more, as Lenski’s lab later showed, the mutational pathway simply increased the initial strength of binding to the original protein until it also bound the structurally similar one.” “the fact that some properties can develop gradually does not mean that all can (such as the book’s major example of chloroquine resistance). Thus the new lambda function is neither irreducibly complex nor beyond the edge of evolution.” ↩
- 62a.
- 63.
Lozovsky, Elena R. et al. “Stepwise acquisition of pyrimethamine resistance in the malaria parasite.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 106(29):12025–12030. Jul 21, 2009. Read from the publisher PDF as archived by the Wayback Machine; page numbers are the printed folios. The paper codes each form as four digits for positions 51, 59, 108 and 164, so 0010 is S108N alone. Mirrors: PMC | Archive.org
- 63a.
Page 12025: “The coding sequence for dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) from the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum was mutagenized, and tests were carried out in Escherichia coli under conditions in which the endogenous bacterial enzyme was selectively inhibited.” “The most frequent pathway (S108N and then C59R, N51I, and I164L) accounts for more than half of the simulated realizations.” ↩
- 63a.
- 64.
Batten, Don. “The adaptation of bacteria to feeding on nylon waste.” Journal of Creation 17(3):3–5. 2003. Batten is a plant physiologist with Creation Ministries International. Read from the copy of the web page in the library. The web page has no page numbers.
- 64a.
Section Stasis in bacteria: “Note that the number of bacterial generations possible in over 130 years is huge—equivalent to tens of millions of years of human generations, encompassing the origin of the putative common ancestor of ape and man, according to the evolutionary story, indeed perhaps even all primates.” The bacterium meant is Pseudomonas aeruginosa, named in 1872. ↩
- 64a.
- 65.
uz-Zaman, Md Hassan et al. “Promoter recruitment drives the emergence of proto-genes in a long-term evolution experiment with Escherichia coli.” PLoS Biology 22:e3002418. 2024. Open access, CC BY. Read from the publisher PDF in the library. Mirror: PMC
- 65a.
Page 15: “Future experimental studies will be required to establish whether the novel transcripts and peptides we detected affect E. coli fitness or are byproducts of mutations that are beneficial because of their effects on nearby, existing genes.” ↩
- 65a.