Planet Formation — The Literature

Every source behind the planet formation article: what it measured, which way it cuts, and how it was obtained.

This page lists every source the article rests on, says what it actually measured, and states which side of the question it helps.  Unlike the star formation companion, a substantial fraction of these sources support the creationist objection rather than refuting it.

Verification rule used throughout.  No quotation was taken from a summarising tool.  Every arXiv and journal source was downloaded as a PDF and searched in extracted text.  The Weidenschilling paper is a 1977 scan and was read through OCR; the two quoted sentences were checked against the surrounding page.  Web articles were downloaded and stripped locally.

The creationist source

Source What it argues Notes
Hartnett, Planetary system formation: exposing naturalistic storytelling, creation.com, 17 Feb 2016 Dust cannot grow past the bouncing/fragmentation limit; metre bodies fall into the star in 100 years; the angular momentum split is unexplained; no planetary system has been seen forming The most detailed young-earth treatment located. His sources are quoted accurately and his mechanical objections are substantially correct. Three of his claims have been overtaken by observations published after 2016.

Hartnett's technical sources are a Swinburne University course module (HET620-M09A01) and Carroll & Ostlie's An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics, 2nd ed., pp. 862–863.  Neither was obtained directly; both are quoted only as he quotes them.

The barriers — sources that support the objection

Source Measurement or result Which way it cuts
Weidenschilling, MNRAS 180:57, 1977 Radial drift velocities "of the order of 104 cm/s for metre-sized objects"; "For s ∼ 100 cm, τc < 100 yr at r = 1 AU" For the objection. The primary source for the metre-size barrier, and Hartnett's figure is exactly right.
Zsom et al., A&A 513:A57, 2010 Laboratory-calibrated collision model at 1 au: growth stops by bouncing, maximum particle mass ≈ 1 g, insensitive to gas density and turbulence For the objection. The barrier is worse than the fragmentation picture it replaced, because bouncing produces no fragments.
Blum & Wurm, ARA&A 46:21, 2008 Laboratory review: sticking fails above ~1 m/s; "the direct formation of kilometer-sized planetesimals cannot (yet?) be understood via sticking collisions" For the objection. Widely quoted by creationists, accurately.
Gundlach & Blum, ApJ 798:34, 2015 µm water-ice particles stick below 9.6 m/s, ~10× the silicate threshold; erosion above 15.3 m/s Against the objection, as of 2015.
Musiolik & Wurm, ApJ 873:58, 2019 Ice surface energy falls by almost two orders of magnitude from 273 K to 180 K; at disk temperatures ice is not stickier than silicate For the objection, and it reopens the standard escape route. Contested.
Birnstiel, review, arXiv:2312.13287, 2024 Summarises the unsettled state of the fragmentation-velocity question Neutral; establishes that the dispute is live.
Manara, Morbidelli & Guillot, A&A 618:L3, 2018 Class II disk dust masses, Gaia-corrected, are comparable to or lower than the heavy-element content of known exoplanet systems For the objection. A real, unresolved budget problem, and one creationists have not used.
Helled & Bodenheimer, ApJ 789:69, 2014 Uranus and Neptune require "very specific conditions"; with higher accretion rates the problem becomes that they should have become gas giants Partly for the objection. The problem changed shape rather than disappearing.

The proposed crossing — and its tests

Source Result Which way it cuts
Youdin & Goodman, ApJ 620:459, 2005 Solid-gas drag is linearly unstable; pebble clumps concentrate Against the objection. Theory.
Johansen et al., Nature 448:1022, 2007 Boulders "undergo efficient gravitational collapse in locally overdense regions in the midplane"; collapse is much faster than radial drift Against the objection. Simulation.
Simon et al., ApJ 822:55, 2016 Streaming instability with self-gravity gives the planetesimal mass and size distribution Against the objection. Simulation.
Morbidelli et al., Icarus 204:558, 2009 Reproducing the 100 km bump in the asteroid size distribution requires initial planetesimals of ~100 km — solids "jumped … without passing through intermediate values" Against the objection, and independent. Derived from asteroid data, not written to defend the instability.
Nesvorný et al., Nat. Astron. 3:808, 2019 Kuiper belt binaries are prograde and equal-sized as gravitational collapse predicts; capture models implying retrograde orbits "can be ruled out" Against the objection. A prediction that could have failed.
McKinnon et al., Science 367:eaay6620, 2020 Arrokoth is "the product of a gentle, low-speed merger"; 10 m/s impacts shear rather than merge; even 5 m/s distorts Against the objection. A photograph of what the mechanism predicts.
Lambrechts & Johansen, A&A 544:A32, 2012 Pebble accretion shortens core growth by 30–1,000× at 5 au and 100–10,000× at 50 au Against the objection, with stated preconditions.
Drążkowska et al., Protostars and Planets VII, 2023 Review of the whole chain from pebbles to exoplanets Background.
Johansen et al., Protostars and Planets VI, 2014 Review of planetesimal formation Background.

Observations of planet formation in progress

Source Measurement Which way it cuts
ALMA Partnership, ApJL 808:L3, 2015 HL Tau: ringed disk around a ≤1–2 Myr source Against the objection.
Andrews et al., ApJL 869:L41, 2018 (DSHARP) Rings and gaps are common in disks at high resolution Against the objection.
Keppler et al., A&A 617:A44, 2018 PDS 70 b: point source at 195 mas (~22 au) inside a 54 au gap, five epochs, three bands, three instruments, bound, planetary mass Against the objection, decisively.
Haffert et al., Nat. Astron. 3:749, 2019 Two Hα sources in the gap — PDS 70 b and c — both accreting Against the objection.
Benisty et al., ApJL 916:L2, 2021 ALMA at 2.3 au resolution: a circumplanetary disk around PDS 70 c Against the objection. A disk around a planet inside a gap inside a disk.
Segura-Cox et al., Nature 586:228, 2020 IRS 63: four rings around a protostar under 500,000 years old Against the objection; also pushes planet formation earlier.
Tychoniec et al., A&A 640:A19, 2020 Class 0 disks hold a median 158 M⊕ of dust, Class I 52 M⊕ — 10× and 3× the Class II values. The budget closes only if planet formation starts in Class 0 Partly answers the Manara problem, at the cost of moving the whole timeline earlier.
Mills et al., Nature 533:509, 2016 Kepler-223: four planets in a librating 4:3, 3:2, 4:3 resonant chain Against the objection. Migration test.
Luger et al., Nat. Astron. 1:0129, 2017 TRAPPIST-1: seven planets in a full resonant chain Against the objection. Migration test.
NASA Exoplanet Archive, pscomppars, 9 Aug 2026 6,336 confirmed planets, 4,749 host stars, 567 planets in ≥4-planet systems Context.

Angular momentum

Source Measurement Which way it cuts
Belloche, EAS Publ. Ser. 62:25, 2013 Specific angular momentum by stage. Dense cores 1021–22 cm² s−1; Sun 1015; solar system 1017; exoplanet systems 1016–18 Both. States the real 6–7 order-of-magnitude problem, and shows the solar system is typical of exoplanet systems.
Lee, arXiv:2607.28056, 30 Jul 2026 Core-to-disk angular momentum profiles in HH 212, HH 211 and B335 match inside-out collapse with ejection by jets and winds Against the objection. The removal is measured.
Bailey, Batygin & Brown, AJ 152:126, 2016 The Sun's obliquity "remains an open question"; their own answer requires Planet Nine Partly for the objection. A genuine unexplained feature of our system.
Bouvier et al., Protostars and Planets VI, 2014 Angular momentum evolution of young stars; disk-locking and magnetised winds Background.
Computed here Sun holds 99.866 % of the mass, ~0.6 % of the angular momentum; Jupiter 61.5 % of the planetary total Corrects Hartnett's "1 %" in his favour, then shows why the split is largely geometric.

Arithmetic computed here, not quoted

  1. Angular momentum budget. Planetary orbital angular momentum L = M√(GM☉ a(1−e²)) summed over the eight planets gives 3.13 × 1043 kg m² s−1, of which Jupiter is 1.93 × 1043 (61.5 %). The Sun's spin L = kM R²ω with the helioseismic moment-of-inertia factor k = 0.070 and a 25.38-day sidereal period gives 1.93 × 1041 — 0.61 % of the total. Using k = 0.059 instead gives 0.52 %. Sun's share of the mass: 99.866 %.
  2. Why the split is geometric. Orbital angular momentum scales as √a. Jupiter's orbital radius is about 1,100 solar radii, so moving Jupiter's mass to the Sun's surface would divide its angular momentum by about 33.
  3. Specific angular momentum of the whole solar system: (3.13 × 1043 + 1.93 × 1041) ÷ 1.99 × 1030 = 1.6 × 1013 m² s−1 = 1.6 × 1017 cm² s−1, matching Belloche's tabulated 1017.

Not obtained

  • Blum & Wurm 2008 was read through the extensive verbatim excerpts in this site's research notes plus the openly posted Berkeley copy; the Annual Reviews version of record was not purchased.
  • Carroll & Ostlie, 2nd ed., pp. 862–863 and the Swinburne module HET620-M09A01 — Hartnett's sources, quoted only as he quotes them.
  • Youdin & Goodman 2005 and Johansen et al. 2007 were downloaded but are cited for their headline results only; no quotation is taken from either.
  • Spike Psarris, What You Aren't Being Told About Astronomy — the origin of several circulating solar-system claims. Not obtained, as noted also in the solar system age article.

What would change the verdict

  • Against the standard account: if the streaming instability's required solid enhancement turns out not to arise in real disks; if the disk-mass problem does not close even with Class 0 formation; if the ice fragmentation velocity settles near 1 m/s and no other route past the barrier survives.
  • For it: a direct detection of streaming-instability filaments in a disk; a measured planetesimal size distribution in a young disk; resolution of the disk-mass budget.

Next updates

  • Track the ice fragmentation-velocity dispute. It is the single most movable number in this article.
  • Watch for further ALMA and JWST work on PDS 70 and on the growing list of gap-hosting disks.
  • Revisit the Uranus/Neptune problem after the next generation of pebble-accretion population syntheses.